Evidence Hub

Contribution of copy number variations to the risk of severe eating disorders

Kushima I, Imaeda M, Tanaka S, Kato H, Oya-Ito T, Nakatochi M, Aleksic B, Ozaki N

Psychiatry and clinical neurosciences, 2022

70 participants

Abstract

AIM: Eating disorders (EDs) are complex, multifactorial psychiatric conditions. Previous studies identified pathogenic copy number variations associated with NDDs (NDD-CNVs) in ED patients. However, no statistical evidence for an association between NDD-CNVs and EDs has been demonstrated. Therefore, we examined whether NDD-CNVs confer risk for EDs.

METHODS: Using array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH), we conducted a high-resolution CNV analysis of 71 severe female ED patients and 1045 female controls. According to the American College of Medical Genetics guidelines, we identified NDD-CNVs or pathogenic/likely pathogenic CNVs in NDD-linked loci. Gene set analysis was performed to examine the involvement of synaptic dysfunction in EDs. Clinical data were retrospectively examined for ED patients with NDD-CNVs.

RESULTS: Of the samples analyzed with aCGH, 70 severe ED patients (98.6%) and 1036 controls (99.1%) passed our quality control filtering. We obtained 189 and 2539 rare CNVs from patients and controls, respectively. NDD-CNVs were identified in 10.0% (7/70) of patients and 2.3% (24/1036) of controls. Statistical analysis revealed a significant association between NDD-CNVs and EDs (odds ratio = 4.69, P = 0.0023). NDD-CNVs in ED patients included 45,X and deletions at KATNAL2, DIP2A, PTPRT, RBFOX1, CNTN4, MACROD2, and FAM92B. Four of these genes were related to synaptic function. In gene set analysis, we observed a nominally significant enrichment of rare exonic CNVs…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 70 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free