Evidence Hub

Complications in Children with Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome Following Spine Surgery: Analysis of the Pediatric National Surgery Quality Improvement Program Database

Matur AV, Nouri A, Huang S, Elson NC, Jeong W, Bierbrauer KS, Mangano FT, Cheng JS

World neurosurgery, 2020

369,176 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (EDS) is a group of rare congenital disorders of connective tissue that result in tissue fragility and joint hyperextensibility. Owing to its rarity, outcomes of pediatric spine surgery in patients with EDS are poorly characterized. Although it has been suggested that complication rates are high, few studies have characterized these complications.

METHODS: Pediatric National Surgery Quality Improvement Program data from 2012-2016 were analyzed. Patients with EDS undergoing spine surgery were identified along with patients without EDS undergoing the same surgeries using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision and Current Procedural Terminology codes.

RESULTS: Of 369,176 total patients, 279 were determined to have EDS. Of these, 56 patients underwent spine surgery; 46% were male and 54% were female (P = 0.108). Mean age at surgery was 11.59 years (P = 0.888) with a range of 1.77-17.33 years. The most common procedure was arthrodesis (n = 37). There were no differences in unplanned reoperations (n = 4, P = 0.119), wound infections or disruptions (n = 2, P = 0.670), or overall complications (n = 25, P = 0.751). Blood transfusions were required in 41% of patients with EDS, but this was not significant compared with patients without EDS undergoing the same procedures (n = 23, P = 0.580). The total amount of blood transfused (P = 0.508), length of hospital stay (P = 0.396), and total operative time (P = 0.357) were not different…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health. Reported size: 369,176 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free