Evidence Hub

Cardiometabolic Benefits and Risks of Sodium-Glucose Co-Transporter-2 (SGLT-2) Inhibitor and Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 (GLP-1) Receptor Agonist Combination Therapy in Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review

Tantawy D, Musa Rabih MR, Ibrahim Mohamed RS, Abdelrahman Ali MO, Mohammed Saad Aldeen RSA, Ahmed Abdelkarim AO, Awadalkreem Mohamedzain TG

Cureus, 2025

2 citations

Abstract

Type 2 diabetes (T2DM) management increasingly focuses on cardiometabolic protection. Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) have complementary mechanisms, making their combination a promising strategy. This systematic review evaluates the cardiometabolic benefits and risks of SGLT2i and GLP-1 RA combination therapy in T2DM. Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science was conducted for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published between 2020 and 2025. Nine RCTs, including cardiovascular outcome trials and mechanistic studies, were included. Data on cardiovascular, renal, glycaemic, and safety outcomes were extracted. The Cochrane RoB 2 tool was used for quality assessment. Combination therapy demonstrated additive cardioprotective effects. Post-hoc analyses showed GLP-1 RAs reduced major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and heart failure hospitalisation regardless of background SGLT2i use, and SGLT2i benefits were maintained with concomitant GLP-1 RAs. The combination provided superior glycaemic control (HbA1c reduction), weight loss, and systolic blood pressure reduction compared to monotherapy. The safety profile was consistent with the known effects of each drug class, with no new or unexpected safety signals and manageable gastrointestinal and genital infection risks. The…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free