Evidence Hub

Epidemiology and Clinical Outcomes of Community-Acquired Acute Kidney Injury in the Emergency Department: A Multisite Retrospective Cohort Study

Michael R. Ehmann, Eili Y. Klein, Xihan Zhao, Jonathon Mitchell, Steven Menez, Aria G Smith, Scott Levin, J. Hinson

American Journal of Kidney Diseases, 2023

139,632 participants · 24 citations

Abstract

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE

The prevalence of community-acquired AKI (CA-AKI) in the United States (US) and its clinical consequences are not well described. Our objective was to describe the epidemiology and clinical outcomes associated with CA-AKI.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

The study included 178,927 encounters by 139,632 adults at five US emergency departments (EDs) between 7/1/17 and 12/31/22.

PREDICTORS

CA-AKI, identified using KDIGO serum creatinine (sCr) based criteria.

OUTCOMES

For encounters resulting in hospitalization, the in-hospital trajectory of AKI severity, dialysis initiation, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and death. For all encounters, occurrence over 180 days of hospitalization, ICU admission, new or progressive CKD, dialysis initiation, and death.

ANALYTICAL APPROACH

Multivariable logistic regression analysis to test the association between CA-AKI and measured outcomes.

RESULTS

For all encounters, 10.4% of patients met the criteria for any stage of AKI on arrival to the ED. 16.6% of patients admitted to the hospital from the ED had CA-AKI on arrival to the ED. The likelihood of AKI recovery was inversely related to CA-AKI stage on arrival to the ED. Among encounters for hospitalized patients, CA-AKI was associated with in-hospital dialysis initiation (OR 6.2, 95% CI 5.1-7.5), ICU admission (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.7-2.0), and death (OR 2.2, 95% CI 2.0-2.5) compared to those without CA-AKI. Among all encounters, CA-AKI was…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 139,632 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free