Evidence Hub

Uniform efficacy of SGLT2 inhibitors across the ejection fraction spectrum and in high-risk patients with HFpEF: a prespecified pooled analysis

Xue X, Yu Z, Dai M, Zhang T

Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2026

12,251 participants

Abstract

Background: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) accounts for over half of all heart failure cases and imposes a high symptom burden. Although SGLT2 inhibitors are guideline-recommended, it remains uncertain whether their efficacy is uniform across the entire LVEF spectrum and in high-risk populations like recently hospitalized patients.

Objective: To definitively assess the consistency of SGLT2 inhibitor efficacy and safety across LVEF subgroups and in extended, high-risk HFpEF populations through a prespecified pooled analysis.

Methods: This trial-level pooled analysis included 12,251 HFpEF patients (LVEF >40%) from the EMPEROR-Preserved and DELIVER trials. Prespecified subgroups were defined by baseline LVEF (2 and interaction tested.

Results: SGLT2 inhibitors significantly reduced the risk of the primary endpoint by 20% vs. placebo (HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.73-0.87, P P = 0.690) and extended to key high-risk subgroups: recently hospitalized patients in DELIVER (HR 0.74) and those with HFimpEF (HR 0.71). No new safety signals were identified.

Conclusion: This analysis confirms a uniform class effect of SGLT2 inhibitors in HFpEF, with consistent cardiovascular protection regardless of LVEF or high-risk clinical status. These findings solidify their role as foundational therapy and support a universal treatment strategy across the ejection fraction spectrum.

Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD420261277529,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 12,251 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free