Evidence Hub

Telemedicine Is Associated with Faster Diagnostic Imaging in Stroke Patients: A Cohort Study

N. Mohr, T. Young, K. Harland, Brian Skow, Amy Wittrock, A. Bell, M. Ward

Telemedicine journal and e-health, 2019

28 citations

Abstract

Background: Meeting time goals for patients with time-sensitive conditions can be challenging in rural emergency departments (EDs), and adopting policies is critical. ED-based telemedicine has been proposed to improve quality and timeliness of care in rural EDs. Introduction: The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that diagnostic testing in telemedicine-supplemented ED care for patients with myocardial infarction (MI) and stroke would be faster than nontelemedicine care in rural EDs. Materials and Methods: This observational cohort study included all ED patients with MI or stroke in 19 rural critical access hospitals served by a single real-time contract-based telemedicine provider in the upper Midwest (2007–2015). The primary outcome for the MI cohort was time-to-electrocardiogram (EKG) and for the stroke cohort was time-to-head computed tomography (CT) interpretation. To measure the relationship between telemedicine and timeliness parameters, generalized estimating equations models were used, clustering on presenting hospital. Results: Of participating ED visits, 756 were included in the MI cohort (29% used telemedicine) and 140 were included in the stroke cohort (30% used telemedicine). Time-to-EKG did not differ when telemedicine was used (1% faster, 95% confidence interval [CI] −4% to 7%), or after telemedicine was implemented (4% faster, 95% CI −3% to 10%). Head CT interpretation was faster for telemedicine cases (15% faster, 95% CI 4–26%). No…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free