Evidence Hub

EXHANCE-3: a cohort study of the exhalation delivery system with fluticasone for chronic sinusitis with or without nasal polyps

M. Sher, G. Steven, J. Romett, Gary C. Pien, K. LeBenger, J. Messina, J. Carothers, R. Mahmoud et al.

Rhinology, 2019

705 participants · 35 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Inhaled nasal corticosteroid sprays (INS) are often inadequate to treat chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). The exhalation delivery system with fluticasone (EDS-FLU; XHANCE®) may improve outcomes in CRS by increasing medication delivery to target superior/posterior anatomic sites. This study assessed safety and efficacy of EDS-FLU in a large population with moderate-tosevere CRS with or without nasal polyps (CRSwNP, CRSsNP).

METHODS

Prospective, multicenter, 12-week, single-arm study of EDS-FLU 372 µg twice daily (BID) at 38 U.S. sites. Safety was assessed by adverse-event evaluations, nasal endoscopy, and ocular examinations. Efficacy was serially assessed by outcomes including nasal endoscopy (Lund-Kennedy Score, polyp grade), patient- and physician-reported outcomes (22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test [SNOT-22]), study-defined surgical indicator assessment, and Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC).

RESULTS

705 comparatively refractory subjects were enrolled, 603 CRSsNP and 102 CRSwNP [moderate-to-severely symptomatic; baseline SNOT-22 ~43, high rates of prior INS use (92.3%) and/or prior surgery (27.5%)]. More than 90% reported improvement on treatment by PGIC. SNOT-22 scores improved substantially and similarly in patients with NP (-23.7) and without NP (-24.4). Among patients with baseline Lund-Kennedy edema scores >0, 33.3% (CRSwNP) and 54.8% (CRSsNP) had complete resolution of edema. In CRSwNP patients, 48% had polyp elimination in ≥1 nostril, 63% had ≥1-point…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 705 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free