Evidence Hub

Dapagliflozin vs empagliflozin in patients with chronic heart failure: a registry analysis

Ivana Jurin, I. Hadžibegović, H. Jurin, D. Rudan, Nikola Pavlović, Marija Radić, Š. Manola, V. Trkulja

Croatian Medical Journal, 2025

393 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

Aim To assess the relative efficacy of dapagliflozin and empagliflozin in routinely treated chronic heart failure (CHF) patients. Methods Data from a registry of prevalent and incident CHF patients were used to set up cohorts (new-user design) of patients started on dapagliflozin or empagliflozin in addition to other guideline-directed therapy. Cohorts were mutually balanced on a range of characteristics, and were assessed for the incidence of a composite of all-cause death/major adverse cardiac events (primary outcome) over the initial 6 months of treatment, and for New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class at 6 months (secondary outcome). Frequentist and Bayes estimates were generated for the dapagliflozin vs empagliflozin comparison. Results In both prevalent (dapagliflozin n = 393, empagliflozin n = 328) and incident (dapagliflozin n = 124, empagliflozin n = 116) patients, those prescribed dapagliflozin had somewhat higher incidence of the primary outcome, but the confidence intervals were wide (RR = 1.385, 95%CI 0.882-2.173 [prevalent], RR = 2.192, 95%CI 0.765-6.282 [incident]), and were more likely to present with a worse NYHA class at 6 months (OR = 1.552, 95%CI 1.142-2.108 [prevalent], OR = 1.503, 95%CI 0.844-2.676 [incident]). In the pooled data, primary events (n = 102) were more common in dapagliflozin-prescribed patients (frequentist estimate RR = 1.519, 95%CI 1.239-1.861; Bayes RR = 1.380, 95%CrI 0.981-1.944). Dapagliflozin-prescribed patients were also…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 393 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free