Evidence Hub

The relationship between shame, eating disorders and disclosure in treatment

Swan S, Andrews B

The British journal of clinical psychology, 2003

68 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study considered shame in 68 women who had received treatment for eating disorders (EDs) compared to 72 non-clinical controls, and shame in relation to disclosure in treatment.

METHOD: All participants completed questionnaires on ED and depressive symptoms, and bodily, behavioural and characterological shame and shame around eating. ED women also answered questions on disclosure in treatment.

RESULTS: The ED group scored significantly higher than controls on all shame areas when depression was controlled. ED women who were currently symptomatic and those who had recovered scored higher than controls on bodily and characterological shame and shame around eating. Non-disclosure in treatment was reported by 42% of the ED group and was associated with higher shame in all areas except bodily shame.

CONCLUSIONS: The study is the first to show a relationship between shame and ED in a clinical sample. It supports existing evidence regarding the importance of bodily shame in women with EDs, and extends the literature in terms of the importance of other shame aspects for ED symptomatology and disclosure. Implications for treatment are discussed.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case-control, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 68 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free