Evidence Hub

Clinical and sociodemographic factors associated with frequent use of emergency services by persons of advanced age in Paris: a nested case-control study

L. Reinhart, A. Dechartres, Sebastien Beaune, D. Bonnet-Zamponi, Anthony Chauvin, Y. Yordanov

Emergencias, 2024

300 participants · 6 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To identify clinical and sociodemographic characteristics of frequent use of emergency departments by persons of advanced age.

METHODS

Nested case-control study in a cohort of patients aged 75 years or older attending 3 hospital emergency departments (EDs) in Paris between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2019. The index date was defined by the last visit during the study period. Frequency was defined as making 4 or more visits to an ED during the year prior to the index date. Controls were patients who visited an ED fewer than 4 times. We first analyzed sociodemographic factors related to frequent use and then randomly selected a convenience sample of 300 patients (150 frequent users and 150 in the non-frequent users) stratified by hospital. In this sample we analyzed clinical factors associated with frequent use. The statistical analysis included multivariate logistical regression models.

RESULTS

A total of 29 009 patients of advanced age visited the 3 EDs; 1241 (4.3%; 95% CI, 4.1%-4.5%) were frequent users in the year prior to their index date. Independent factors associated with frequent visiting were older age (odds ratio [OR], 1.03; 95% CI, 1.02-1.04); male sex (OR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.02-1.29); the presence of comorbidities, eg, a history of falls (OR, 2.42; 95% CI, 1.27-4.70), stroke (OR, 4.07 (95% CI, 1.84-9.69), or cognitive decline (OR, 2.53; 95% CI, 1.20-5.45); loss of autonomy (OR, 2.70; 95% CI, 1.38-5.41); and medications, eg, diuretics (OR, 2.10; 95%…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case-control, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 300 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free