Evidence Hub

Sensory profiling in classical Ehlers-Danlos syndrome: a case-control study revealing pain characteristics, somatosensory changes, and impaired pain modulation

M. Colman, D. Syx, I. de Wandele, L. Rombaut, D. Wille, Zoë Malfait, M. Meeus, A. Malfait et al.

Journal of Pain, 2023

19 participants · 5 citations

Abstract

Pain is one of the most important, yet poorly understood complaints in heritable connective tissue disorders (HCTD) caused by monogenic defects in extracellular matrix molecules. This is particularly the case for Ehlers-Danlos syndromes (EDS), paradigm collagen-related disorders. This study aimed to identify the pain signature and somatosensory characteristics in the rare classical type of EDS (cEDS) caused by defects in type V or rarely type I collagen. We used static and dynamic quantitative sensory testing and validated questionnaires in 19 individuals with cEDS and 19 matched controls. Individuals with cEDS reported clinically relevant pain/discomfort (VAS ≥5/10 in 32% for average pain intensity the past month) and worse health -related quality of life. An altered somatosensory profile was found in the cEDS group with higher (p=0.04) detection thresholds for vibration stimuli at the lower limb indicating hypoesthesia, reduced thermal sensitivity with more (p<0.001) paradoxical thermal sensations, and hyperalgesia with lower pain thresholds to mechanical (p<0.001) stimuli at both the upper and lower limbs and to cold (p=0.005) stimulation at the lower limb. Using a parallel conditioned pain modulation paradigm, the cEDS group showed significantly smaller antinociceptive responses (p-value 0.005 - 0.046) suggestive of impaired endogenous pain modulation. In conclusion, Individuals with cEDS report chronic pain and worse health-related quality of life, and present altered…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case-control, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 19 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free