Evidence Hub

Multimodal Investigations of Structural and Functional Brain Alterations in Anorexia and Bulimia Nervosa and Their Relationships to Psychopathology

Xinyang Yu, Lauren Robinson, M. Bobou, Zuo Zhang, T. Banaschewski, G. Barker, A. Bokde, H. Flor et al.

Biological Psychiatry, 2024

130 participants · 14 citations

Abstract

Background Neurobiological understanding of eating disorders (EDs) is limited. This study presents the first comparative multimodal magnetic resonance imaging assessments of anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa and uncovers neurobiological differences associated with these disorders. Methods This case-control study included 57 healthy female control participants and 130 female participants with EDs (bulimia nervosa and anorexia nervosa subtypes). Structural and functional magnetic resonance imaging assessed gray matter volume (GMV), cortical thickness, and task-based activities related to reward processing, socioemotional functioning, and response inhibition. Whole-brain group differences were correlated with ED psychopathology. Results Significant structural differences were observed in the ED group compared with healthy control participants, including reduced GMV in the left lateral orbitofrontal cortex and lower cortical thickness in the left rostral middle frontal gyrus and precuneus after adjusting for body mass index. Specific structural alterations were only evident in anorexia nervosa subgroups. GMV reductions in the orbitofrontal cortex were linked to impulsivity, while lower cortical thickness in the frontal gyrus correlated with cognitive restraint in eating, suggesting that these regions may play key roles in ED psychopathology. Functional magnetic resonance imaging also revealed notable differences. During reward anticipation, participants with EDs exhibited…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case-control. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 130 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free