Evidence Hub

Retinal and optic nerve measures after initiation of empagliflozin plus metformin versus metformin alone in early type 2 diabetes: a prospective observational comparative study

Bora Deniz Argon, A. Çakır, S. Çakır, Fidan Safalı, M. Elçioğlu, M. Adaş

Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2026

1 citation

Abstract

Purpose: To explore whether empagliflozin added to metformin is associated with short-term changes in optical coherence tomography (OCT) and visual evoked potential (VEP) parameters in adults with newly diagnosed early type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

Methods: In this prospective observational comparative study, adults with newly diagnosed T2DM received metformin alone (M) or empagliflozin plus metformin (EM) according to routine clinical care. Outcomes were macular ganglion cell complex (GCC) and peripapillary retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL) thickness measured by OCT, and pattern-reversal VEP parameters. Confounding by indication was addressed using propensity-score overlap weighting. Six-month change was analysed using baseline-adjusted overlap-weighted regression with HC3 robust standard errors. Secondary endpoints were controlled using the Benjamini-Hochberg false discovery rate. An additional exploratory repeated-measures mixed-effects analysis incorporating baseline, 3-month, and 6-month data was also performed. Only right eyes were included.

Results: Eighty participants were analysed (40 per group). Overlap weighting achieved excellent covariate balance (maximum weighted absolute standardized mean difference, 0.017). At 6 months, mean GCC change favoured EM over M (β = +3.33 μm; 95% CI, 2.90 to 3.76; p < 0.001). Secondary outcomes also favoured EM, including shorter VEP P100 latency (β = -10.06 ms; 95% CI, - 12.07 to - 8.05; q < 0.001) and greater VEP N75-P100…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free