Evidence Hub

Long-Term Use of Empagliflozin vs. DPP4 Inhibitors Mitigates eGFR Slopes in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: Real-World Evidence

H. Heerspink, Anja B. Kuhlman, Johannes F. E. Mann, S. Rasmussen, P. Rossing, Blaz Vrhnjak, David Z. I. Cherney

Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 2022

Abstract

Background: Randomized controlled studies showed that sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) mitigate kidney function loss in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) at high cardiovascular (CV) and kidney risk. However, long-term efficacy studies in general population with T2D are lacking. Methods: In Maccabi Healthcare Services, a large Israeli database (2015-2021), we compared the change in eGFR in patients with T2D who initiated empagliflozin (EMPA) or any SGLT2i, vs dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor (DPP4i). Treatment arms were propensity score-matched by 96 baseline characteristics. Subjects were followed until death, end of data availability, exposure discontinuation, initiation of the comparator drug, after 5 years, or October 2021. In a previous analysis we showed that compared to DPP4i, EMPA and any SGLT2i reduce the risk of the primary kidney outcome ( ≥ 40% eGFR declined or end-stage kidney disease). In this secondary analysis, we compared the change in eGFR

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free