Evidence Hub

Paracetamol poisoning: which nomogram should we use?

Reid D, Hazell W

Emergency medicine (Fremantle, W.A.), 2003

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine the type of paracetamol nomograms used in Australasian EDs. To review the literature to determine the evidence base for existing nomograms.

METHODS: A cross sectional descriptive study via postal survey of all Australasian EDs accredited for specialist emergency medicine training by the Australasian College for Emergency Medicine (ACEM). A literature review using Knowledge Finder search engine was employed.

RESULTS: The response rate was 87%. The most commonly used nomogram had a four-hour treatment level of 1300 mumol/L (69%). A total of 22% of respondents used a four-hour treatment level of 1000 mumol/L. Two departments (3%) treated all patients above the 660 mumol/L line. Eleven departments (15%) did not have a treatment line below 1300 mumol/L.

CONCLUSION: Practice varies in Australasian EDs. Patients with paracetamol levels below the 1300 mumol/L have been reported in the literature to develop hepatotoxicity, and deaths have been documented. N-acetylcysteine is extremely safe when used in the recommended dosages.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free