Evidence Hub

The association between crowding and mortality in admitted pediatric patients from mixed adult-pediatric emergency departments in Korea

Cha WC, Shin SD, Cho JS, Song KJ, Singer AJ, Kwak YH

Pediatric emergency care, 2011

125,031 participants

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate the effect of crowding on the hospital mortality of pediatric patients from adult-pediatric mixed emergency departments (EDs).

METHODS: We used the National Emergency Department Information System database, which included demographic, clinical, diagnostic, and procedural information with all emergency patients visiting to 116 EDs from Korea since 2004. We enrolled EDs with mean length of stay of more than 6 hours. Study period was from January 2006 to December 2008. Pediatric patients younger than 15 years admitted from these EDs were study targets. We calculated the mean patient volume (mean number of patients in the ED) over 8-hour shift for each hospital. When the volume reached the highest quartile, the period was considered as crowded. Patients who came during the overcrowded period were defined as the crowded group. We performed a Kaplan-Meier analysis, and hazard ratio and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated using a Cox proportional hazards regression model.

RESULTS: A total of 34 EDs and 125,031 admitted pediatric patients were included; 74,152 (59.3%) were male, and the mean age was 3.84 (95% CI, 3.82-3.86) years; 35,924 (28.7%) were determined as the crowded group. The 30-day mortality rates were 0.4% and 0.3% (P = 0.063) for the crowded group and for the noncrowded group, respectively. The hazard ratio for hospital mortality of the crowded group was 1.230 (95% CI, 1.019-1.558).

CONCLUSIONS: The ED crowding was…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 125,031 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free