Evidence Hub

Quality of life and Eating disorders in women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome

Elleuch M, Elloumi Y, Turki I, Boujelbene K, Frikha H, Charfi N, Mnif M, Hadj Kacem F et al.

La Tunisie medicale, 2025

101 participants

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a common endocrine disorder affecting women worldwide, posing a major public health concern. This multifaceted condition significantly impairs quality of life (QOL) across multiple domains.

AIM: To assess QOL and eating disorders (EDs) in patients with PCOS.

METHODS: A cross-sectional descriptive and comparative study was conducted on women with confirmed PCOS who were followed in the Endocrinology Department of Hedi Chaker Hospital, Sfax, Tunisia, and a targeted group of women with PCOS recruited through Google Forms. The PCOSQ-42 questionnaire for unmarried women, the PCOSQ-47 for married women, and the SCOFF questionnaire were used as assessment tools. Participants were divided into two groups: Group 1, consisting of French participants, and Group 2, consisting of Tunisian participants.

RESULTS: A total of 71 French participants (Group 1) and 101 Tunisian participants (Group 2) were included in the study. All participants reported a compromised QOL. Among married women, the psychological well-being domain had the lowest score (2.86 ± 0.7), while the menstrual and fertility disorders domain was the most affected among unmarried women, with an average score of 2.84 ± 0.8. EDs were identified in 70.93% of participants, with a higher prevalence among unmarried women. A better QOL was observed among married women in Group 2 compared to their counterparts in Group 1.

CONCLUSION: The findings reveal a high prevalence of impaired…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 101 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free