Evidence Hub

Efficacy and Safety of Early Initiation of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors in Acute Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Emídio Mata, Bernardo Resende, Margarida Castro, J. Português, Sílvia Ribeiro, J. Gameiro, António Lourenço, Lino Gonçalves

Korean Circulation Journal, 2026

3,596 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Acute heart failure (AHF) remains associated with high short-term mortality and rehospitalization despite advances in therapy. Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) provide robust cardiovascular benefits in heart failure, but their efficacy and safety when initiated during AHF hospitalization are less established.

METHODS

Following a systematic search of 4 databases, a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the initiation of dapagliflozin or empagliflozin during hospitalization for AHF, in addition to standard therapy. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included heart failure hospitalization (HFH), all-cause mortality at 1 month, cardiovascular death, serious adverse events leading to drug discontinuation, acute kidney injury (AKI), urinary tract infection (UTI), symptomatic hypotension, hypoglycemia, and diabetic ketoacidosis. Data were pooled using random-effects models, with sensitivity and meta-regression analyses.

RESULTS

Eight RCTs including 3,596 patients (1,817 SGLT2i; 1,779 control) were analyzed. SGLT2i initiation in AHF significantly reduced all-cause mortality (risk ratio [RR], 0.63; confidence interval [CI], 0.46-0.85; I²=0%) and all-cause mortality at 1 month (RR, 0.75; CI, 0.57-0.98; I²=0%). HFH and cardiovascular death did not differ significantly between groups. Pooled analyses showed no excess risk of…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 3,596 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free