Evidence Hub

SGLT‐2 Inhibitors for Ascites Management in Liver Cirrhosis: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Available Evidence

Abdallah Al Ghnaimat, N. Ahmed, O. Al-Azzawi, EzzElDien A. Ibrahim, Roaa Rayyan, Souheb Alkloub, Ekram Al Joufi, Ezz Eldein Breish et al.

International Journal of Hepatology, 2026

382 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Goal The goal is to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of SGLT‐2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) versus standard therapy for ascites management in liver cirrhosis. Background SGLT2i promote natriuresis and osmotic diuresis, offering potential therapeutic benefits for fluid overload in cirrhosis, similar to their established role in heart failure. However, high‐quality comparative evidence remains limited. Study A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, Embase, and Web of Science was conducted through October 2025 following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials and prospective comparative studies enrolling adults (≥ 18 years) with confirmed cirrhosis treated with dapagliflozin or empagliflozin, alone or alongside standard therapy, versus placebo or standard care for ≥ 2 weeks. The primary outcome was complete ascites resolution; secondary outcomes included mortality, body weight, eGFR, and serum creatinine and sodium levels. Results Three studies (two RCTs and one prospective trial; n = 382) were included, comprising 241 patients receiving SGLT2i and 141 controls. SGLT2i significantly increased complete ascites resolution (OR: 2.39, 95% CI: 1.47–3.90; p < 0.001; I 2 = 15%) and reduced body weight (MD: −4.86 kg, 95% CI: −7.57 to −2.14; p = 0.0005; I 2 = 0%). No significant differences were observed in eGFR, serum creatinine, serum sodium, or mortality within the RCT subgroup (OR: 1.60, 95% CI: 0.53–4.87; I 2 = 0%); the overall…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 382 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free