Evidence Hub

Impact of carbon and platinum protective layers on EDS accuracy in FIB cross-sectional analysis of W/Hf/W thin-film multilayers

M. Sikora, D. Wojcieszak

Micron, 2024

8 citations

Abstract

Achieving high-quality cross sections is essential for accurate analysis of multilayer coatings. One method of performing such cross sections is focused ion beam, where sample protection from ion damage in the form of protective layers applied by FEBID and FIBID methods is used. Due to the lack of comparative summaries of different layers applied by these methods, especially in the context of cross-sectional analysis and elemental analysis of the cross-section, it was decided to address the effect of the protective layer on the reliability of EDS analysis. This study compares the effectiveness of platinum and carbon protective layers in creating cross sections for W/Hf/W samples. The effect of protective layers on elemental mapping and elemental analysis accuracy was evaluated. This study highlights the importance of protective layer selection in providing reliable EDS analysis of cross sections.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free