Evidence Hub

Factors associated with antenatal depression during the COVID‐19 (SARS‐CoV2) pandemic: A cross‐sectional study in a cohort of Turkish pregnant women

O. Korukcu, M. Ozkaya, O. Boran, M. Bakacak

Perspectives in psychiatric care, 2021

497 participants · 10 citations

Abstract

Abstract Purpose To determine the effect of the COVID‐19 pandemic on antenatal depression in Turkish pregnant women. Design and Methods In this cross‐sectional study, data were collected from 497 pregnant women between May and July 2020 using the Edinburgh Depression Scale (EDS) to determine the effect of obstetrics history, fear of hospitalization, concerns about the pandemic, birth, and the health of both mother and infant, on antenatal depression during the COVID‐19 outbreak in Turkey. Findings The general EDS mean score of the total group was determined as mean 13.70 ± 6.22, which was higher than the critical cutoff point of 13. According to the multiple linear regression model applied in the study, the best predictive variables for the mean EDS score were determined to be concerned about completing a healthy pregnancy (r = −0.45), social media and news programs related to COVID‐19 increasing levels of concern (r = −0.31), fear of hospitalization as the birth approaches (r = −0.45), having bad dreams during the COVID‐19 pandemic (r = −0.41), the request for an elective cesarean delivery because of fear of catching COVID‐19 (r = −0.40), fear of breastfeeding the infant (r = −0.45), and concerns that their own health would be negatively affected because of the pandemic (r = − 0.39), and these variables affected the mean EDS score negatively (total variance 40.5%, R = 0.642). Practical Implications The COVID‐19 pandemic has created an urgent need to implement specific…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 497 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free