Evidence Hub

Effects on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in persons treated with sotagliflozin: Prespecified pooled analyses of the Phase 3 type 2 diabetes program

Michael J. Davies, Darren K. McGuire, Belinda J. Hardin, P. Banks, M. Girard, Guillermo Umpierrez

Global Cardiology Science & Practice, 2026

15,000 participants

Abstract

Background: In the SCORED trial that included 10,584 participants with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and chronic kidney disease (CKD), sotagliflozin significantly reduced the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). To further evaluate the cardiovascular effects of sotagliflozin, prespecified MACE-focused meta-analyses were performed using data from 9 additional Phase 3 trials conducted in persons with T2D.

Methods: This patient-level meta-analyses pooled data from 9 Phase 3 trials assessing glycemic control and other cardiometabolic parameters in a total of 5,100 participants. 2,904 participants were treated with sotagliflozin (pooling 200 and 400mg doses), while 2,196 were in an All-Comparators group (pooling placebo, empagliflozin, and glimepiride). Time to first event for 4-point MACE [CV death, nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), nonfatal stroke, and hospitalization for unstable angina) was the prespecified primary analysis. Secondary outcomes included 3-point MACE (omitting unstable angina) and analyses of each MACE component outcome. Time-to-event analyses were conducted using Cox proportional hazards models for the first occurrence of any adjudication-confirmed event.

Results: There were 98 4-point MACE events and 96 3-point MACE events across the dataset. Event rate of 4-point MACE was 1.6 events per 100 patient-years (PY) in the sotagliflozin group compared with 2.2 events per 100 PY in the All-Comparators group. Sotagliflozin was associated with a 39%…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 15,000 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free