Evidence Hub

Severe poisoning after self-reported use of 2-(4-iodo-2,5-dimethoxyphenyl)-N-[(2-methoxyphenyl)methyl]ethanamine, a novel substituted amphetamine: a case series

Hieger MA, Rose SR, Cumpston KL, Stromberg PE, Miller S, Wills BK

The American journal of emergency medicine, 2015

10 participants · 22 citations

Abstract

Significant toxicity from amphetamine and cathinone derivatives is being increasingly reported. We describe a series of self-reported exposures to 2-(4-iodo-2,5-dimethoxyphenyl)-N-[(2-methoxyphenyl)methyl]ethanamine (25-I-NBOME or 25-I), a novel amphetamine derivative. Ten patients with an average age of 17 years presented to local emergency departments (EDs) in our community after ingestion and/or insufflation of a drug referred to as "25-I." Of 10 patients, 6 reported taking 25-I alone; other substances included ethanol; 2,5-dimethoxy-4-ethylphenethylamine; marijuana; and ketamine. Most common effects included tachycardia (90%), hypertension (70%), agitation (60%), and hallucinations (50%). The average heart rate was 123 beats per minute. Two patients were found in status epilepticus, and another was found unresponsive. One patient who had a seizure had multiple, discrete intraparenchymal hemorrhages and acute kidney injury. Six patients were admitted to the intensive care unit, two were treated in the ED and released, and 1 each was admitted to psychiatry or managed in a clinical decision unit and subsequently discharged. Three patients required emergent intubation, and all admitted patients (7/10) were given intravenous benzodiazepines for sedation. Urine and blood specimens were obtained from 1 patient, which showed analytic confirmation of 25-I. In addition to sympathomimetic effects, methoxy and other substituent groups impart serotonergic effects, resulting in…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health. Reported size: 10 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free