Evidence Hub

Misdiagnosis of hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lens optic opacification: report of 8 cases with the MemoryLens

Haymore J, Zaidman G, Werner L, Mamalis N, Hamilton S, Cook J, Gillette T

Ophthalmology, 2007

8 participants

Abstract

PURPOSE: To report 8 patients with misdiagnosis of MemoryLens intraocular lens (IOL) late postoperative calcification and the resulting potentially avoidable procedures leading to secondary complications.

DESIGN: Retrospective interventional case series.

PARTICIPANTS: Eight patients with an opacified hydrophilic acrylic MemoryLens.

METHODS: Eight cases of MemoryLens IOL opacification that were originally misdiagnosed were reviewed. The following parameters were noted: baseline patient characteristics, time frame of IOL opacification, original misdiagnosis, subsequent surgical procedures, and postexplantation outcomes and complications. Two explanted lenses from this series were available for laboratory analyses. They underwent gross and light microscopic evaluation and scanning electron microscopy with energy-dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (EDS).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient parameters noted above. The IOLs were examined for distribution, structure, and composition of the deposits causing opacification of their optic components.

RESULTS: All 8 patients' IOLs were implanted between August 1999 and March 2000. Complaints of decreased visual function occurred 13 to 58 months after implantation. Half of the patients were initially diagnosed as having posterior capsular opacification and underwent neodymium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser capsulotomy. The other half were initially diagnosed with some form of vitreous involvement and underwent vitrectomies. Six of the 8 patients…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health. Reported size: 8 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free