Evidence Hub

Midterm Outcomes of Isolated Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction for Patellar Instability in Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome

Parikh SN, Nemunaitis J, Wall EJ, Cabatu C, Gupta R, Veerkamp MW

Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2024

47 participants · 10 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patellar instability is frequently encountered in patients with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (EDS). The clinical outcomes of isolated medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLR) for patellar instability in patients with EDS are unknown.

PURPOSE: To evaluate midterm clinical outcomes of isolated MPFLR for patellar instability in patients with EDS and factors affecting these outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS: In a retrospective study, 31 patients (n = 47 knees) with EDS and patellar instability who underwent isolated MPFLR for recurrent patellar instability between 2008 and 2017 and had a minimum 2-year follow-up were identified. Preoperative radiographic images were measured for anatomic risk factors. Clinical outcomes-including postoperative complications-were evaluated. Factors associated with MPFLR failure were identified. Postoperative patient-reported outcomes (PROs)-including the pediatric version of the International Knee Documentation Committee, the Kujala score, the Hospital for Special Surgery Pediatric Functional Activity Brief Scale, the Banff Patellofemoral Instability Instrument 2.0, and the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-were collected, and factors affecting PRO scores were analyzed.

RESULTS: The mean age of the cohort was 14.9 ± 2 years. At a mean follow-up of 7.2 years, 18 of 47 (38.3%) knees required reoperations, of which 9 of 47 (19.1%) knees required revision stabilization for recurrent…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health. Reported size: 47 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free