Evidence Hub

Can treatment response to SGLT2-inhibitors in syndrome of inappropriate antidiuresis be predicted by copeptin, natriuretic peptides and inflammatory markers?

Rianne Nobbenhuis, J. Refardt, D. Vogt, C. Sailer, B. Winzeler, M. Christ-Crain

Biomarkers, 2021

84 participants · 5 citations

Abstract

Abstract Purpose The syndrome of inappropriate antidiuresis (SIAD) is the main cause of hyponatremia and the SGLT2-inhibitor empagliflozin is a promising new treatment option. A biomarker predicting treatment response could optimize treatment success. Materials and methods Secondary analysis of a trial including 84 hospitalized patients with SIAD-induced hyponatremia. Patients were randomized to four days of treatment with empagliflozin 25 mg/d (n = 43) or placebo (n = 41) with both groups receiving fluid restriction 76 mmol/l led to a specificity of 91.7% [95% confidence interval (CI): 75%, 100%] and sensitivity of 51.9% [33.3%, 70.4%] to predict non-response to fluid restriction alone. Conclusions Based on our data, no biomarker could be identified as predictor for treatment response to empagliflozin. Urinary sodium was confirmed as a good marker for non-response to fluid restriction in SIAD patients. Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (Number: NCT02874807)

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 84 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free