Evidence Hub

Opacification of intraocular lenses implanted during infancy: a clinicopathologic study of 4 explanted intraocular lenses

Pehere NK, Bojja S, Vemuganti GK, Vaddavalli PK, Samant M, Jalali S, Bhate M

Ophthalmology, 2011

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To report the clinicopathologic features of 4 opacified, single-piece, hydrophilic, acrylic intraocular lenses (IOLs) explanted from children who had undergone IOL implantation during infancy.

DESIGN: Observational case series.

PARTICIPANTS: Four IOLs explanted from 4 eyes of 3 children for visually significant opacification were included in the study.

METHODS: The clinical details of each case were obtained to look for possible risk factors for IOL opacification. The explanted IOLs were subjected to gross examination, staining by alizarin red 1% for calcium, scanning electron microscopy, and energy-dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (EDS). Levels of calcium and phosphorous were analyzed in the serum of all cases and in the aqueous humor of 1 case.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Morphologic features and composition of deposits.

RESULTS: Two cases had congenital cataract while one case was after bilateral lens sparing vitrectomy for retinopathy of prematurity. All underwent surgery during infancy with implantation of an IOL. The IOLs were explanted 8 months after surgery from 4 eyes of 3 children at the age of 17, 25, and 26. All the children received a single-piece hydrophilic acrylic IOL. The IOLs were in situ for an average duration of 13.86 months. The deposits were in the shape of a bicycle wheel on 3 IOLs and looked like fish eggs on 1 IOL. All deposits stained bright orange with alizarin red. On EDS, the deposits were found to be composed of calcium, phosphate, and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free