Evidence Hub

Craniocervical Stabilization After Failed Chiari Decompression: A Case Series of a Population with High Prevalence of Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome

Zhao DY, Rock MB, Sandhu FA

World neurosurgery, 2022

15 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the treatment of Chiari malformation type I (CM-I), posterior fossa decompression is achieved via suboccipital craniectomy (SOC); however, some patients continue to experience symptoms after treatment, which may be due to craniocervical instability (CCI). The purposes of this study were to analyze data from patients who required an occipitocervical fusion (OCF) for the management of CCI after having previously undergone SOC for CM-I to determine if OCF is a safe and effective option and to determine any identifiable risk factors for CCI in these patients.

METHODS: A retrospective review was done on all patients who underwent an OCF performed by the senior author between November 2013 and June 2020 after having previously undergone SOC for CM-I. Demographic, radiographic, perioperative, and outcome data were collected and clivoaxial angles (CXAs) were measured pre- and postoperatively.

RESULTS: Fifteen patients were identified who developed symptomatic CCI after previously undergoing a suboccipital craniectomy for the treatment of CM-I. All 15 patients were treated by OCF with good outcome. Of these, 12 patients had a known diagnosis of Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (EDS). Overall, the CXAs of these patients were found to be corrected to a more anatomical alignment.

CONCLUSIONS: Symptomatic CCI should be recognized as a delayed postoperative complication in the surgical treatment of CM-I, with an underlying connective tissue hypermobility disorder such as EDS serving…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health. Reported size: 15 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free