Evidence Hub

Acquired methemoglobinemia in children presenting to Italian pediatric emergency departments: a multicenter report

Raucci U, Stanco M, Roversi M, Ponticiello E, Pisani M, Rosa M, Falsaperla R, Pavone P et al.

Clinical toxicology (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2022

14 participants

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Methemoglobinemia (MetHb) is a rare inherited or acquired cause of cyanosis in children. Owing to its rarity, case reports and case series are mostly available in the current literature. This study reports data on a large sample of children with acquired MetHb.

METHODS: Data on patients admitted for acquired MetHb between January 2007 to December 2020 was extracted from the databases of five Italian pediatric emergency departments (EDs). Demographical and clinical characteristics was reported and discussed.

RESULTS: Nineteen cases of acquired MetHb were evaluated. Ten patients (52.6%) were male and 9 (47.4%) were female. The median age was 8.23 months. The median time from trigger to symptom onset was 6 hours. Mostly, the intoxication presumptively occurred by home ingestion of contaminated food, mainly badly preserved vegetable broth. All patients were cyanotic at admission, most patients also presented tachycardia and/or tachypnea, and two patients were comatose. Antidotal therapy with methylene blue was given in 14 patients (73.7%). The median hospital stay was 2 days. All patients survived.

DISCUSSION: As MetHb leads to the pathognomonic brown blood discoloration, blood gas analysis is mandatory immediately upon hospital arrival of a cyanotic patient. A correct medical history is crucial to identify the trigger and remove it. In our sample, the age onset was much lower than in the previous literature, and MetHb mainly due to ingestion of contaminated…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health. Reported size: 14 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free