Evidence Hub

Skills-based online self-help program for carers of people with an eating disorder (SupportED): A case series evaluation

Miskovic-Wheatley J, Schlage J, Pehlivan MJ, Simone R, Koreshe E, Hunt C, Maguire S

The International journal of eating disorders, 2024

39 participants · 4 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the acceptability, feasibility, and preliminary effectiveness of "SupportED," a novel, online, self-paced skills-based program for carers/support people of those with lived and/or living experience of an eating disorder (ED).

METHOD

Carers of a loved one with an ED were invited to undertake a five-module skills-based (one core module, four optional modules) online program at their own pace. Modules cover general information about EDs, communication, practical skills, treatment engagement, and recovery. Participants completed demographics and were assessed using EDSIS, CASK, and DASS-21 for caregiver burden, skills, and distress, respectively, at program completion and 3-month follow-up. Feedback on the program and modules was also collected.

RESULTS

Most carers (65%; 82/126) completed the core module of the program, which is on par with other online learning programs. Nearly half of program completers responded to the 3-month follow-up (n = 39). On average, carers rated the program as relevant and useful and found the information validating and easy to understand, albeit a few carers found the program time-consuming and technically challenging. Intent-to-treat (ITT) linear mixed models demonstrated the preliminary effectiveness of the program for improving carer burden and skills, although the change in carer distress was non-significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Results of this case series evaluation suggest SupportED is an acceptable and feasible program for…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health. Reported size: 39 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free