Evidence Hub

Exploring fibronodular hepatocellular carcinoma: a case series investigating histopathologic and clinical characteristics and its potential association with cirrhosis

Ghandour F, Zein-Sabatto B, Lobo J, Patel C, Dhall D, Manne U, Al Diffalha S

American journal of clinical pathology, 2026

6 participants

Abstract

Objectives: Fibronodular hepatocellular carcinoma (FN-HCC) is a newly described variant of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), with only 29 cases reported. Histologically, it is divided into multiple smaller, well-defined tumor nodules by extensive fibrosis. Its differential diagnosis includes other HCC variants characterized by fibrous stroma, such as fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma and scirrhous hepatocellular carcinoma. Fibronodular hyperplasia may also be considered in the differential diagnosis. We are reporting 7 cases to help better understand this entity.

Methods: We retrospectively identified 7 cases of FN-HCC and analyzed the clinical and histologic features of each tumor, as well as disease progression and patient prognosis.

Results: The FN-HCC cases were diagnosed at a median age of 58 years (range, 40-75 years), with a male predilection (n = 6, 86%). Most patients were White (n = 6, 86%), and 1 was African American (n = 1, 14%). Tumors had a mean size of 3.15 cm (range, 1-9 cm) and were mainly located in the right lobe (n = 5, 71%). Background liver was cirrhotic in 6 cases (86%). Five patients were hepatitis C positive (71%). All tumors were surgically removed, with a free resection margin. Among 3 patients with evident vascular invasion, 1 had a positive lymph node. This patient had tumor metastasis 6 years later; otherwise, all patients were disease free on follow-up.

Conclusions: Our cohort was concordant with published data showing a male predilection,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health. Reported size: 6 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free