Evidence Hub

Efficacy and Safety of SGLT2 Inhibitors in Heart Failure: Observational Evidence in Geriatric Patients-AGING-HF.

Hacil A, Antakly Hanon Y, Lacour A, David JP, Khalifa T, Piccoli M, Clémencin A, Assayag P et al.

Circulation. Heart failure, 2025

496 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) have shown beneficial effects in heart failure (HF) management, but data on their use in geriatric populations with high comorbidity remain limited. This observational study aimed to assess the real-world efficacy and safety of SGLT2i in elderly patients with HF.

METHODS: This prospective multicenter study included 496 patients hospitalized for acute heart failure across 3 geriatric units. The mean age was 90 years, and the mean Charlson Comorbidity Index score was 8.2. Participants were divided into 2 groups: the SGLT2i group (n=260) receiving SGLT2i (empagliflozin or dapagliflozin) alongside standard HF treatment, and the Control group (n=236) receiving only standard HF treatment. The primary outcomes were all-cause mortality, HF rehospitalizations, and adverse events over 1 year.

RESULTS: SGLT2i use was associated with lower risks of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.46-0.98]; P=0.031), HF rehospitalization (hazard ratio, 0.64 [95% CI, 0.42-0.97]; P=0.037), and the composite outcome (hazard ratio, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.44-0.82]; P=0.001) at 1 year, after multivariable adjustment. No significant interaction was observed between left ventricular ejection fraction status and SGLT2i use (P for interaction=0.12). Although urinary and genital infections were more frequently reported in the SGLT2i group, treatment discontinuation remained low (2.7%).

CONCLUSIONS: In this elderly population with high…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 496 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free