Evidence Hub

Insights into TNXB-Related Classical-Like Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome: A Study of Polish Patients

Junkiert-Czarnecka A, Pilarska-Deltow M, Kacprzak MM, Łobodzińska A, Sobczyńska-Tomaszewska A, Linkowska K, Grzybowski T, Haus O

Open access rheumatology : research and reviews, 2026

Abstract

Objective: Ehlers-Danlos syndromes (EDS) are a heterogeneous group of heritable connective tissue disorders with diverse clinical and genetic backgrounds. Classical-like EDS (clEDS, OMIM 606408) is an extremely rare autosomal recessive subtype caused by biallelic variants in TNXB. Fewer than 100 cases have been described worldwide. This study aimed to identify and characterise TNXB-related variants in two Polish patients with clinical features suggestive of clEDS.

Methods: Two male patients, aged 13 and 14 years, underwent comprehensive genetic testing, including next-generation sequencing (NGS) using a connective tissue gene panel, Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA), and Sanger sequencing. Family segregation analysis was performed to confirm compound heterozygosity.

Results: NGS and confirmatory analyses identified compound heterozygous TNXB variants: c.[7222C>T];[8780T>C], p.[Pro2408Ser];[Ile2927Thr] in Patient 1, and c.[5947_5948delinsTT];[8300C>T], p.[Glu1983Leu];[Thr2767Ile] in Patient 2. Both variants were located in non-homologous TNXB exons, minimising the risk of misinterpretation due to pseudogene sequences. The clinical presentations of both patients were consistent with the major diagnostic criteria for classical-like EDS.

Conclusion: This report presents the first genetically confirmed Polish patients with a classical-like form of Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, expanding the known clinical and molecular spectrum of TNXB-related EDS. Our findings…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free