Evidence Hub

Toxicological and Clinical Characteristics of Fatal Cases in the Emerging Drugs Network of Australia-Victoria (EDNAV) Clinical Registry 2020-2025

White J, Hampton SJ, Greene S

Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA, 2026

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study is to characterise the analytical toxicology findings and clinical features of fatal cases recorded in the Emerging Drugs Network of Australia-Victoria (EDNAV) clinical registry.

Methods: EDNAV is a state-wide toxicosurveillance system capturing de-identified demographic, clinical and analytical data from ED presentations with illicit drug-related toxicity. Venous blood samples are screened for illicit, pharmaceutical and novel psychoactive substances (NPS) using liquid chromatography-quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry. We conducted a retrospective observational case series of fatal registry cases recorded between September 2020 and December 2025.

Results: Forty-six fatal cases were identified (0.9% of 5026 EDNAV cases). Most patients were male (89%) with a median age of 33 years. Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest occurred in 67% of cases. Polysubstance exposure predominated (91%), with a median of three substances detected per case. Mixed stimulant-sedative patterns were most common (64%), followed by opioid-benzodiazepine (19%) and stimulant-only (7%). The most frequent individual detections were methamphetamine (54%), heroin (52%), diazepam (37%), cocaine (20%) and MDMA (17%). NPS accounted for 7.8% of detections, were never identified in isolation and were predominantly novel benzodiazepines (80%). Hypoxic brain injury was the most common terminal complication (72%).

Conclusion: Fatal cases were characterised by near-universal…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free