Evidence Hub

Total Joint Arthroplasty in Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome Is Associated with Increased Instability and Revision: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Muhammad IM, Valiyakathu MF, Yousaf M, Hussain Y, Bretherton C

Indian journal of orthopaedics, 2026

415,000 participants

Abstract

Background: Total joint arthroplasty (TJA) has been increasingly performed in younger and medically complex patients. Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (EDS), a heritable connective tissue disorder characterised by ligamentous laxity and soft tissue fragility, may predispose patients to adverse arthroplasty outcomes, yet existing evidence remains fragmented.

Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Comparative studies evaluating postoperative outcomes following primary TJA in patients with EDS versus non-EDS controls were identified from MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and CENTRAL through November 2025. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed to estimate pooled risk ratios (RRs) for revision, instability or dislocation, aseptic loosening, periprosthetic fracture (PPFx), periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), wound complications, medical complications, and readmission or reoperation.

Results: Nine retrospective cohort studies encompassing over 415,000 patients were included. Compared with non-EDS patients, those with EDS demonstrated a significantly higher risk of instability or dislocation (RR 2.93, 95% CI 2.37-3.61) and all-cause revision (RR 1.97, 95% CI 1.29-3.02), particularly following total hip arthroplasty. Aseptic loosening and wound complications occurred more frequently in EDS patients, though associations were less consistent across models. No significant differences were observed in risks of PJI, medical…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 415,000 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free