Evidence Hub

The importance of stabilisation in enabling bone fusion demonstrated by successful revision of failed occipitocervical fusion using patient-specific atlantoaxial joint spacers: a case report

Yataganbaba A, Parr WCH, Hill JC, Seex KA

Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong), 2025

2 citations

Abstract

Background: The surgical management of occipitocervical junction (OCJ) pathologies is challenging due to the unique anatomy and biomechanics. Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (EDS) is a heterogeneous group of rare hereditary disorders of connective tissue (HDCTs) resulting from mutations in collagen genes. In OCJ pathologies related to EDS, occipitocervical fusion (OCF) is preferred when conservative treatment proves insufficient. The literature indicates that complications associated with OCF are more common in patients with EDS and other HDCTs. The management of failure in OCF surgery is particularly challenging. This case report provides an example of surgical management of failed OCF using patient-specific atlantoaxial joint spacers.

Case description: In this case report, we describe a male patient with EDS who underwent OCF and experienced complete reabsorption of the bone graft and nonunion. The condition was then successfully treated using custom-made, anatomically conforming 3D-printed titanium alloy (Ti-6Al-4V) facet joint devices. The clival-axial angle was increased from 127.5 degrees after the first operation to 152.4 degrees with the facet joint devices. At 8 months postoperatively, X-rays demonstrated no change in alignment. At the 15-month follow-up, the patient reported no symptoms except for morning muscle spasms.

Conclusions: Although an extensive body of literature studies the effects of EDS on connective tissue and its clinical manifestations, studies investigating…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free