Evidence Hub

The Successful Treatment of a Patient with Ehlers–Danlos Syndrome (EDS) After an Extensive Burn Injury: A Case Report

Karolina Ziółkowska, Anna Słaboń, J. Glik, M. Maj, M. Olszak, Karolina Mikuś-Zagórska, P. Strzelec, Katarzyna Czerny et al.

Medicina, 2025

4 citations

Abstract

Introduction: Ehlers–Danlos Syndromes (EDSs) are a heterogeneous group of monogenic connective tissue disorders (e.g., joint hypermobility and dislocation, skin hyperelasticity and fragility, chronic pain, delayed wound healing process,, etc.). The primary objective of this study was to present a specialized therapeutic wound management process for a burn-injured female patient diagnosed with EDS. Case Presentation: A 34-year-old female patient presented with extensive thermal burns (biofireplace explosion). The patient had a family history of diagnosed EDS. Additionally, the patient was in a poor mental condition and, since 2020, had been undergoing pharmacotherapy with antidepressant and anti-anxiety medication. This might be the first such clinical observation in the world, but a correlation has been observed between psychiatric medication use and EDS wound healing impairment. During the hospitalization process, the patient underwent a series of surgeries aimed at the fastest and most effective closure of wounds. The patient, after 182 days of hospitalization in our facility, was discharged home. Materials and Methods: During the patient’s hospital stay, the patient underwent multiple procedures involving debridement of necrotic tissues. Additionally, allogeneic acellular dermal matrix (ADM) grafting was performed on the wounds, and a procedure was conducted in which skin was grafted using the MEEK technique. The in vitro cultured skin cells, as the advanced therapy…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free