Evidence Hub

Scanning Electron Microscopy Identification of Microscopic Onyx Fragments in Blood Aspirated from a Distal Access Catheter after Arteriovenous Malformation Embolization: A Case Report

Takahashi S, Hirai S, Fujita K, Fujii S, Sagawa H, Ishikawa M, Wakabayashi H, Sumita K

Journal of neuroendovascular therapy, 2026

Abstract

Objective: Endovascular embolization with Onyx (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA), a non-adhesive liquid embolic agent, is widely used to treat cerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVMs); however, ischemic complications remain a concern. Although aspiration of blood from a distal access catheter (DAC) after microcatheter retrieval is commonly performed in clinical practice, its mechanistic rationale has not been clarified. We report a case in which scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) were used to evaluate whether microscopic Onyx fragments could be detected in aspirated blood.

Case presentation: A patient with a Spetzler-Martin grade III occipital AVM underwent transarterial embolization using Onyx. Retrieved microcatheters and blood aspirated from the DAC were analyzed using SEM/EDS. Tantalum-containing microscopic aggregates consistent with Onyx were identified on the microcatheter surface and in the aspirated blood. The detected fragments measured approximately 50-90 µm. In addition, a simplified experimental model demonstrated reproducible adhesion of Onyx to microcatheters and frequent detection of Onyx material within the DAC lumen.

Conclusion: This case demonstrates that microscopic Onyx fragments can be detected in blood aspirated from a DAC using SEM/EDS. While the clinical significance of these findings remains uncertain, our findings suggest that microscopic Onyx-derived material may persist within the catheter system…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free