Evidence Hub

Bilateral optic neuritis and multiple nerve sheath tumors in a patient with genetically characterized Ehlers-Danlos syndrome: A rare co-occurrence

Larios A BR, Mendoza Blandón MS, Barahona Vargas S, Romero Ríos CK

Radiology case reports, 2026

1 citation

Abstract

Classical‑like Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (clEDS) due to TNXB variants is a hereditary connective tissue disorder that shares clinical features with classic EDS but differs genetically from the COL5A1/COL5A2‑associated cEDS subtype. The coexistence of inflammatory optic neuropathy and multiple nerve sheath tumors in this context is rarely reported. We describe a 26-year-old woman with genetically characterized clEDS (TNXB variant) who presented with subacute bilateral visual loss. Orbital magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) demonstrated bilateral optic nerve thickening and contrast enhancement consistent with active optic neuritis. Comprehensive neuroaxis magnetic resonance imaging revealed multiple intradural-extramedullary and intramedullary nodular lesions involving cranial and spinal segments, radiologically compatible with multiple nerve sheath tumors. Although imaging findings raised suspicion for schwannomatosis, molecular testing for SMARCB1, LZTR1, and NF2 variants were not available, precluding definitive classification according to updated consensus criteria. Antibody testing for AQP4-IgG and MOG-IgG was not performed, limiting etiologic clarification of bilateral optic neuritis. This case highlights the importance of comprehensive neuroaxis imaging in patients presenting with atypical optic neuritis and concurrent neural lesions. Rather than suggesting a syndromic association, it represents a rare co-occurrence requiring cautious interpretation and multidisciplinary…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free