Evidence Hub

Efficacy and Safety of Sglt-2 Inhibitors In Renal Allograft Recipients: an Open-Label, Single-Center Prospective Study

Novikova MS, Minushkina LO, Allazova SS, Zateyshchikov DA, Boeva OI, Kotenko ON, Vinogradov VE, Shilov EM et al.

Kardiologiia, 2025

2,146 participants

Abstract

Aim To evaluate the safety and efficacy of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor (SGLT-2i) inhibitor therapy in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) with and without post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM).Material and methods KTRs (n=2146, with PTDM n=303, or 14%) who had undergone transplantation more than one year ago, with stable graft function (estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) >30 ml/min/1.73 m2), after excluding patients with combined kidney and pancreas transplantation (n=57), type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM) (n=124), and type 2 DM diagnosed before kidney allotransplantation (KAT) (n=74), were prescribed SGLT-2i (empagliflozin 25 mg/day or dapagliflozin 10 mg/day; n=107), the rest of the KTRs (n=1784) did not receive SGLT-2i. After pseudo-randomization, two groups were formed and included in an open, single-center prospective study: an experimental group with SGLT-2i (n=78; with PTDM n=45) and a control group, without SGLT-2i (n=78; n=45 with PTDM). The groups were comparable in the PTDM duration and the period from KAT to inclusion in the study, as well as in clinical characteristics, including gender, age, history of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) before KAT, levels of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP), GFR, microalbuminuria (MAU), blood uric acid concentration, blood lipid profile (total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoproteins (LDL)), basal blood concentration (C0) of calcineurin…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 2,146 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free