Evidence Hub

​​Dapagliflozin vs. Empagliflozin for cardiorenal risk reduction: Real-world paired data and comparative study in Indonesia​ .

Cokro F, Sauriasari R, Tahapary DL, Setiawan H, Tricaesario C, Hidayati N, Soegondo S

F1000Research, 2025

1 citation

Abstract

Background: : Previous studies compared the cardiorenal efficacy of these two types of SGLT2 inhibitors; however, the findings are inconsistent and do not reflect the population of Type 2 diabetic Mellitus (T2DM) patients in Indonesia, which ranks fifth globally in the number of diabetic patients. This study aims to evaluate the effects and safety of dapagliflozin and empagliflozin on cardiorenal risk factors in T2DM Indonesian patients over a 12-month. Methods This study utilized a multicenter retrospective cohort to evaluate diverse cardiorenal risk factors, encompassing glycemic control, blood pressure, lipid profile, body weight, Body Mass Index (BMI), calculated 10-year Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease (ASCVD) risk, and estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR), alongside the safety profile of SGLT2is. Paired data analysis, comparative analysis between groups, and linear regression were conducted to adjust the confounding. Results Both groups exhibited enhancements in HbA1c, Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG), Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP), and Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C). Improvements in BMI, Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP), triglycerides, ASCVD risk, and High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) were only seen in the dapagliflozin group. The comparative study indicated that dapagliflozin markedly decreased body weight and BMI; however, the results became analogous between groups after correction for confounding variables. No significant differences…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free