Evidence Hub

Report of the CIMERC/Drexel University Emergency Department Terrorism Preparedness Consensus Panel

Greenberg MI, Hendrickson RG, CIMERC, Drexel University Emergency Department Terrorism Preparedness Consensus Panel

Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine, 2003

10,000 participants

Abstract

This report describes the consensus recommendations of an expert panel convened to develop recommendations for a hospital-based emergency department (ED) to attain a minimal level of preparedness necessary to respond to mass casualty events derived from the use of weapons of mass destruction. The recommendations were created for use by hospital-based EDs of a variety of sizes and locations (urban, suburban, or rural). The disasters that were considered included those that are biological, chemical, or radiological. The panel focused on preparation for a single disaster that could generate 250-500 total patients in 24-48 hours. This number included asymptomatic, exposed, and symptomatic patients. The panel chose not to address circumstances where a small number of patients with an infectious disease are seen in one or a few hospitals. In addition, the panel believed that preparation of a single hospital for an overwhelming mass casualty situation (e.g., 10,000 patients) would not be broadly applicable and would not be required for an individual ED to "minimally prepared." Prior to the convening of this consensus panel, in June 2002, a search of all relevant agencies found no comprehensive, published, validated recommendations for preparedness for individual EDs. Although several agencies had released information on disaster management, clinical diagnosis and treatment tools, and training, no agency had produced a comprehensive list of items and issues that individual EDs must…

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free