Evidence Hub

Shifting Towards Empagliflozin First-Line Therapy in Glycogen Storage Disease Type Ib: A Nationwide Real-World Study

Uçar SK, Mungan NÖ, Gökçay GF, Zeybek AÇA, Kılavuz S, Güneş S, Kardaş F, Kısa PT et al.

Journal of inherited metabolic disease, 2026

42 participants

Abstract

Neutrophil dysfunction and neutropenia are burdensome findings in glycogen storage disease type Ib (GSDIb). Treatment with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) often corrects neutropenia but fails to improve clinical symptoms like inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Recently, empagliflozin (EMPA) was shown to correct the neutrophil dysfunction and its clinical consequences. It is increasingly used as first-line monotherapy, but long-term, real-world data are lacking. This nation-wide retrospective study investigated 42 GSD1b patients (36 children) treated with EMPA as first-line monotherapy and compared them with those receiving combination therapy with G-CSF and treatment-naïve patients (I:EMPA first-line monotherapy [n = 9]; II:G-CSF monotherapy [n = 7]; III:EMPA plus G-CSF [n = 16]; and IV: neither EMPA nor GCSF [n = 10]). Pediatric (P) patients were evaluated separately. In pediatric patients receiving EMPA as first-line monotherapy (P-I) and those with EMPA plus G-CSF (P-III), the frequency of infections, hospital admissions, and IBD was significantly lower than in patients receiving GCSF-monotherapy (P-II) or no treatment (P-IV). Additionally, significantly improved weight gain was observed in P-I. While clinical improvement related to correction of neutrophil dysfunction was seen with EMPA first-line monotherapy (P-I), significant improvement in absolute neutrophil count (ANC) and hemoglobin levels was only seen in P-III with additional G-CSF treatment. In…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 42 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free