Evidence Hub

A36-08 Guideline-Discordant Inhaler Prescribing for Asthma Exacerbations at Emergency Department Discharge: Comparison Between a Tertiary Academic Medical Center and a Community Hospital

T. George, C. Pulliam, C. Obermiller, B. Rowland, A. Dharod, D. Norton

American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2026

45 participants

Abstract

Based on 2019 Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guidelines, asthma pharmacotherapy that includes inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) and formoterol or albuterol at Emergency Department (ED) discharge reduces exacerbations and improves symptom control, yet adherence to these recommendations remains variable. We aimed to (1) estimate the proportion of ED discharges for asthma with guideline-discordant inhaler prescribing and (2) compare performance between a tertiary academic medical center and an affiliated community hospital.

We performed a retrospective cohort study across two EDs in a single health system from March 2024 to March 2025. Adults (≥18 years) with an ED encounter for asthma or prior asthma diagnosis (defined using ICD-10 code J45) who were prescribed an inhaled bronchodilator and oral corticosteroids and discharged home from the ED were included in the study. We excluded non-discharged encounters (admitted, eloped) and patients with COPD or asthma-COPD overlap diagnoses. Data were extracted from EHR relational databases. The primary outcome was guideline discordance of discharge inhaler therapy, defined as discharge without: (a) ICS-formoterol; (b) ICS-albuterol; or (c) separate ICS combined with formoterol or albuterol. ICS included budesonide, mometasone, fluticasone propionate, fluticasone furoate, and beclomethasone.

Among 221 eligible ED encounters, 97 (43.9%) occurred at the tertiary academic medical center and 124 (56.1%) occurred at the community hospital.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 45 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free