Evidence Hub

Process mapping to design theory-informed strategies reducing inappropriate HFNC use in emergency bronchiolitis care

L. Shaw, Catherine L. Wilson, L. Haskell, Donna Franklin, S. Dalziel, Natalie Taylor, Meredith Borland, Sharon O'Brien et al.

Pediatric Research, 2026

1 citation

Abstract

BACKGROUND

High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) in bronchiolitis is widely used beyond guideline recommendations. This study developed targeted, theory-informed implementation strategies to improve appropriate HFNC use in regional and rural emergency departments (EDs), to be evaluated in a cluster randomised controlled trial (cRCT).

METHODS

A 3-phase process mapping and implementation science approach was embedded in a clinician co-design study involving 12 senior clinicians (5 nurses, 7 doctors) from Australian regional and rural EDs. International and Australian literature informed discussions. Barriers were coded using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) and Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR 2.0) with strategy co-design guided by CFIR-ERIC and TDF-BCT linkages.

RESULTS

Five HFNC decision nodes were identified: assessment of hypoxaemia, low-flow oxygen trial and reassessment, escalation to HFNC, weaning and cessation, and escalation of care. Behavioural factors included fear of deterioration, limited confidence in respiratory assessment, and norms favouring early escalation. Contextual factors included limited paediatric expertise, staff turnover, and unclear de-escalation. Findings informed strategies including targeted education, clinical pathways and audit and feedback.

CONCLUSIONS

Process mapping identified behavioural and contextual drivers of inappropriate HFNC use informing implementation strategies and offering a practical, scalable approach to…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free