Evidence Hub

Effectiveness of oral semaglutide versus empagliflozin for the management of type 2 diabetes. PIONEER-2 trial emulation with real-world data

Fadini GP, Longato E, Poletto S, Giaccari A, Ghiani M, Strazzabosco M, Trombetta M, Penno G et al.

Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2025

207 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Oral semaglutide and empagliflozin are commonly used for the management of type 2 diabetes (T2D), but head-to-head comparisons in real-world settings are limited. We aimed to emulate the PIONEER-2 trial using electronic health records to compare the effectiveness and persistence of oral semaglutide versus empagliflozin.

METHODS: This was a retrospective multicentre study using electronic health records from Italian diabetes clinics. New users of oral semaglutide or empagliflozin were matched 1:2 and followed for up to 18 months. The primary outcome was HbA1c change; secondary outcomes included weight change and treatment persistence. Analyses used mixed models for repeated measures under both treatment policy and trial product estimands.

RESULTS: After matching, we included new users of oral semaglutide (n = 105) or empagliflozin (n = 207). Mean age was 65 years, diabetes duration 10 years, baseline HbA1c 7.6%, BMI 29 kg/m2, and 94% were on metformin. Only 28.6% of new users of oral semaglutide reached the 14 mg dose and 31.4% of empagliflozin new users reached the 25 mg dose. HbA1c reduction was significantly greater with oral semaglutide than with empagliflozin (mean difference - 0.35%, p <0.001). Weight loss over time was similar, with oral semaglutide showing a modest advantage at 18 months among persistent patients. Persistence was lower for semaglutide (HR for discontinuation 1.47, p = 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS: Under routine care, new users of oral…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 207 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free