Evidence Hub

Prescribing Patterns for Patients with Urolithiasis in Emergency Departments: Comparative Analysis of Local Practice versus Evidence-Based Guidelines (2023)

S. Dezfooli, Shirin Choubar, M. Aashari, Hassan Amiri, Reza Mosaddegh, M. Yasinzadeh, Alireza Javan

Journal of Medical Research and Reviews, 2026

168 participants

Abstract

Background:

Kidney stones (urolithiasis) are a common urological emergency requiring symptom management and evidence-based pharmacotherapy. Prescribing practices often deviate from guideline recommendations, potentially contributing to antimicrobial resistance and unnecessary medication exposure.

Objective:

This retrospective, descriptive study evaluated prescribing patterns for renal colic in two Iranian emergency departments (EDs), comparing them with international (AUA, EAU) and regional (Asian) guidelines to identify opportunities for evidence-based optimization.

Method:

This cross-sectional study included 168 patients diagnosed with renal colic at Hazrat Rasul Akram Hospital (primary site) and Firouzgar Hospital during 2023. Data were collected using a standardized checklist capturing demographics, stone characteristics, and medication prescriptions. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 26.

Results:

Of 168 patients (57.7% male, mean age 37.8 ± 11.2 years), all received analgesics (100%). Antispasmodics were prescribed to 75.6% (primarily tamsulosin, 7%), antibiotics to 66.1% (ciprofloxacin 3.9%, amoxicillin 3.4%), H2 receptor antagonists/proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) to 58.9% (famotidine 5.3% [H2 antagonist], pantoprazole 4.8% [PPI]), and urinary alkalinizers to 57.1% (citrate 7.3%). Stone characteristics: predominantly 5–10 mm (85.1%), located in kidney (45.1%), ureter (38.1%), or ureterovesical junction (16.8%).

Conclusion:

While analgesic…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 168 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free