Evidence Hub

Bright light therapy for depression and excessive daytime sleepiness in Parkinson's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with dose-response meta-regression

Messak M, Abdelmageed A, Khattab YA, Mandour Y, Shaker O, Negida A

Neurodegenerative disease management, 2026

194 participants

Abstract

Background: Non-motor symptoms, including depression and excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS), reduce quality of life in Parkinson's disease (PD). Pharmacological treatments may cause side-effects, highlighting the need for non-pharmacological approaches. We conducted an updated meta-analysis with linear and non-linear dose-response meta-regression to evaluate bright light therapy (BLT) on depression and EDS in PD.

Methods: PubMed, Scopus, and WOS were systematically searched through September 2025. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB-2 and NIH single-arm tools. Mean difference (MD) or standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95%confidence intervals (CI) were pooled using fixed-effects models. Linear and non-linear dose-response meta-regressions were performed.

Results: Eight studies were identified, six included in meta-analysis. For EDS, five studies (n = 159) showed no significant effect of BLT (MD =-1.14, 95%CI [-2.43, 0.15], p = 0.083, I2 = 0%), with no linear (p = 0.78) or non-linear (p = 0.97) dose-response relationship. For depression, five studies (n = 194) also showed no significant effect (SMD =-0.13, 95%CI [-0.41, 0.16], p = 0.38, I2 = 0%), without linear (p = 0.82) or non-linear (p = 0.85) associations. Sensitivity analyses were consistent.

Conclusion: BLT was not associated with significant improvement in depression or EDS in PD, and no dose-response relationship was identified. Given methodological limitations, BLT cannot currently be recommended for clinical…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 194 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free