Evidence Hub

Use of SGLT2 Inhibitors Versus DPP-4 Inhibitors and Age-Related Macular Degeneration in Patients WithType 2 Diabetes: A Multinational Cohort Study

Pan SY, Weng CH, Tsai SF, Lin HJ, Lin JF, Lin CH, Wang IJ, Chou CC

Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2025

20,966 participants · 3 citations

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the impact of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) and dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors on age-related macular degeneration (AMD) risk among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

METHODS: This multinational, retrospective cohort study used electronic medical records from healthcare institutions across 21 countries. Adults 50 years or older with T2DM who had a prior prescription of metformin and initiated SGLT2 or DPP-4 inhibitors from 2013 to 2023 were included. The SGLT2 and DPP-4 inhibitor groups were propensity score matched in a 1:1 ratio to balance baseline characteristics and were followed for up to 5 years to observe the occurrence of AMD. Statistical analysis was performed using the Cox proportional hazards model and Kaplan-Meier analysis.

RESULTS: Our final analysis included 20,966 T2DM patients prescribed SGLT2 inhibitors and 20,966 prescribed DPP-4 inhibitors. Compared to the DPP-4 inhibitor group, the SGLT2 inhibitor group was associated with significantly lower risks of AMD (hazard ratio [HR], 0.71; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.58-0.85) and dry AMD (HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.46-0.80) but not wet AMD (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.48-1.16). SGLT2 inhibitors compared with DPP-4 inhibitors were linked to a reduced risk of AMD in the White population, patients prescribed empagliflozin or dapagliflozin, and individuals with glycated hemoglobin < 8.5%, estimated glomerular filtration rate ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m2, hypertension, or dyslipidemia,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 20,966 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free