Evidence Hub

Measurement Properties of the Exercise Dependence Scale-Revised (EDS-R): A Systematic Review Using the COSMIN Methodology

Yifan Yang, Yuanye Zhu, Heng Tian, Yuefan Zhang, Yindong Li

Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 2026

14,779 participants

Abstract

Abstract: The Exercise Dependence Scale-Revised (EDS-R) is widely utilized internationally, yet empirical evaluations of its measurement properties exhibit pronounced inconsistencies. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the full-spectrum measurement properties of the EDS-R by integrating the COSMIN methodology, modified GRADE approach, and a quantitative Reliability Generalization (RG) meta-analysis. Systematic searches were conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, PsycInfo, and CINAHL up to October 24, 2025, without language restrictions. Methodological quality was appraised via the COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist. Twenty-three studies (N = 14,779) across competitive athletes, sports academy students, gym members, and general populations were included. Content validity and hypothesis testing for construct validity (88.9% alignment, 24/27) were rated as sufficient (moderate-quality evidence). Structural validity was supported for the original first-order seven-factor model (20/22, 90.9%; moderate-quality evidence), as well as higher-order and bifactor configurations (sufficient, high-quality evidence); in contrast, variant 5- and 6-factor models showed mixed fit, and a unidimensional model was rejected (insufficient, high-quality evidence). Demographic and athletic subgroup measurement invariance (gender, age, competition level, training duration) was established with high-quality evidence; however, cross-cultural validity across languages was supported by…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 14,779 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free